Judge asks Kanu’s sureties to explain his whereabouts

Tue, Oct 17, 2017 | By publisher


Judiciary

 

JUSTICE Binta Nyako of the federal high court in Abuja on Tuesday, October 17, ordered Eyninnaya Abaribe, a senator, and two others standing as sureties for Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, to explain the whereabouts of Kanu.

The IPOB leader who was granted bail by the judge on April 24, 2017, was absent from court on Tuesday, October 17, when his trial was billed to commence.

But his three co-defendants were produced in court by prison officials.

Ifeanyi Ejiofor, Kanu’s lawyer, told the judge that Kanu had been missing after soldiers allegedly invaded the IPOB leader’s home‎ on September 14, 2017, adding that the Nigerian Army was in the best position to produce the defendant.

Ogechi Ogunna, a counsel to Abaribe on Tuesday, informed the judge ‎that his client had filed a motion seeking to be discharged as Kanu’s surety.

However, Immanuel Shalum Okabenmabu and Tochukwu Uchendu, the two other sureties, were absent from court and not represented by any lawyer.

But Nyako said Abaribe’s motion could not be heard until Kanu was produced in court.

Consequently, the judge gave the senator three options. One was for Abaribe to produce the defendant in court and then apply to be discharged as a surety.

Second, the judge said Abaribe should to be ready to forfeit his N100m bail bond.

The third option ‎was for Abaribe to request to be given time to produce the defendant in court.

But Ogunna replied saying, “he (Abaribe) is not in a position to do any of these.”

Nevertheless, the judge said tha‎t Abaribe must opt for one of the three options.

With the judge’s insistence, Ogunna opted to be given time to produce him.

Earlier, Shuaibu Labaran, prosecuting counsel, noting that Kanu was not present in court, urged the judge to revoke defendant’s bail, order for his arrest, and direct the defendants’ three sureties “to show cause why the bail bond of N100m entered into by each shall not be forfeited or they be committed to prison.”

The trial was been adjourned until November 20.

– Oct 17, 2017 @ 12:21 GMT

Tags: