Politics
ATIKU Abubakar, presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, in the 2019 presidential election and his party have appealed to the Supreme Court to reverse the decision of the presidential election petition tribunal, which upheld the re-election of President Muhammadu Buhari. Atiku and the PDP made the request in a notice of appeal containing 66 grounds which they filed on Tuesday, September 24.
Atiku and the PDP said the tribunal erred in law in its resolution of the five issues it identified for the determination of their petition. The tribunal, in its judgment on September 11, resolved the five issues against the petitioners and in favour of the respondents – the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, Buhari and the All Progressives Congress, APC.
In a cross appeal, the party is asking the Supreme Court to reconsider PEPC’s decision to accept evidence by three witnesses (numbers 40, 59 and 60). They are Atiku’s spokesperson Segun Showunmi, a data expert David Njorga and a data analyst Joseph Gbenga.
Atiku and the PDP faulted the tribunal for holding that Buhari did not need to attach his academic qualifications to the form CF 001 submitted to INEC to secure clearance to participate in the election. On ground one of the appeal, the appellants argued that the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal erred in law when they relied on “overall interest of justice” to hold that the second respondent’s Exhibits R1 to R26, P85 and P86 were properly admitted in evidence.
They also faulted the Justices of the Court of Appeal on the other grounds. In pointing out the errors, the appellants submitted that the Appellate Court gave restrictive interpretation to Section 76 of the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended) in order to exclude Form CF001 from its provisions.
“The conduct of election by INEC, which is the first respondent, starts with the screening of candidates. No candidate can be screened unless he completes Form CF001 (Exhibit P1). “In Form CF001, under the column for ‘Schools Attended/Educational Qualification(s) with Dates’, there is the clear provision: ‘Attach evidence of all educational qualifications.’ Certificates are evidence of educational qualifications.”
The appellants submitted that “Form CF001 is designed to take care of the provision in Section 31(2) of the Electoral Act (as amended)” regarding the “list or information” a candidate is expected to submit and verify by an affidavit.
“The prescription in Form CF001 for a candidate to attach evidence of all educational qualifications is part of statutory requirements. Form CF001 is made pursuant to statutory provisions.”
On ground four, Atiku submitted that the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal erred in law when they held thus: “There was/is no pleadings in the petition to the effect that the second respondent’s failure to attach his certificates to Form CF001 amounts to lack of educational qualification to contest the election.
Meanwhile, the APC has also filed motions challenging sections of the September 11 judgment. Lateef Fagbemi, lawyer to APC, wants the court to remove at least 42 paragraphs from PDP’s petition.
– Sept. 25, 2019 @ 11:09 GMT |
Tags: Atiku appeals ruling of presidential election petition tribunal
