Judge rejects AGF’s prayer for court to revoke Sowore, Bakare’s bail

0
20
Omoyele Sowore, Convener, #RevolutionNow, leaving the Federal High Court, Abuse
Omoyele Sowore, Convener, #RevolutionNow, leaving the Federal High Court, Abuse

THE Federal High Court, Abuja, on Wednesday, refused to grant the application by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), seeking the revocation of bail granted to Omoyele Sowore, Convener, #RevolutionNow, and his co-defendant, Olawale Bakare.

Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu, who turned down the request of the AGF’s Counsel, Kayode Alilu, adjourned the matter until Dec. 10 and Dec. 11 for trial continuation.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the Federal Government had, on Feb. 13, re-arraigned Sowore and Bakare on fresh charges.

The charges include: ” Conspiracy to commit treasonable felony, contrary to Section 516 of the Criminal Code Act, Cap. C38 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004; and treasonable felony, contrary to Section 41(a) of the Criminal Code Act, Cap. C38 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004, which are punishable under the same section of the Act.”

However, Sowore (1st defendant) and Bakare (2nd defendant) pleaded not guilty to the amended two-count charge.

When the matter was called at the resumed trial on Wednesday, though counsel to the parties was in court, Sowore and Bakare were conspicuously absent.

Lawyer to Sowore and Bakare, Marshal Abubakar, who held brief for Femi Falana, SAN, told the court that Sowore, though he was in Abuja, he was indisposed.

He also said that Bakare could not come to court because of the ongoing #EndSARS protest which had crippled activities in Osun where he presently resides.

Alilu then applied that the court should issue a bench warrant against the defendants and likewise revoke the bail granted them having not been in the court for their trial.

The lawyer argued that there was no evidence of medical report showing that Sowore was ill and that the excuse by Bakare of lockdown in the state where he resides was not tenable.

According to him, they have no reason not to be in court has not been here on the last adjourned date.

Abubakar objected to Alilu’s application. He said that Mr. Falana, who he represented, would have loved to be in court but for the crisis in Lagos which had led to the 24-hour curfew.

He said the same scenario was what happened to Bakare.

The counsel, who informed that Sowore had just developed malaria symptoms and could not have gotten a medical report, then told the court that he had a message from the 1st defendant that he was on his way to the court.

Justice Ojukwu, therefore, said when Sowore arrived in the court she should be notified.

The judge, who declined to grant Alilu’s request, adjourned the matter until Dec. 10 and Dec. 11 for trial continuation.

However, after about an hour, Sowore, accompanied by some youth, entered the courtroom.

His lawyer, Abubakar, then stood up to inform the court of his client’s arrival shortly after a case was adjourned.

Justice Ojukwu then asked parties to appear on the next adjourned date.

NAN

– Oct. 21, 2020 @ 13:35 GMT |

Click Banner for Details