Senate Takes Charge of CCT from President
Political Briefs
–
THE Senate on Thursday, October 27, passed a bill amending the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act, which transfers the controlling powers of the bureau and the tribunal from the president to the National Assembly.
As part of the amendment, the CCT shall be made up of the chairman and four other members, with three of the five forming the quorum at every sitting.
The new legislation, however, allows the president to maintain his power of appointment into the CCB.
But the appointment of the chairman and members of the bureau and the tribunal will be subject to the Senate’s approval, with the appointment of those in the bureau limited to a tenure of five years, while the second term will be subject to legislative approval, if the amendment is passed into law.
The House of Representatives had passed the amendment bill in May this year and sent it to the Senate for concurrence.
Samuel Anyanwu, chairman, Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions, while laying a report on the concurrence amendment bill on the floor of the chamber during Thursday’s plenary, recalled that the Senate referred the bill to the committee on October 13, 2016, “for critical examination.”
He admitted that a similar amendment bill was introduced in the Senate earlier in the year, which generated political tension that forced the lawmakers to suspend the process.
According to report, the bill seeks to amend the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act Cap. C15 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2014.
The amendment, the report said, included, “altering the tenure of the Office of the Chairman and members of the bureau; amending the entry age of the chairman and members of the bureau; relocating the power to exercise authority over the bureau from Mr. President to the National Assembly; extending (the) power of the Attorney General of the Federation to prosecute to private legal practitioners to enable the bureau to prosecute its cases; and making certain provisions clearer and more elaborate.”
Before the amendment, Section 18 of the CCB/CCT Act, which formed the crux of the amendment, stated that: “(1) The President may by order exempt any cadre of public officers from the provisions of this Act if it appears to him that their position in the public service is below the rank which it considers appropriate for the application of those provisions.
“(2)The President may by order confer on the bureau such additional powers as may appear to it to be necessary to enable it to discharge more effectively the functions conferred upon it under this Act.”
The amended version now reads: “Section 18 (1) and (2) are amended by substituting ‘President’ with the ‘National Assembly’ and substitute in Subsection 1 ‘him’ with ‘it.’”
The lawmakers also replaced “additional powers” with “additional powers and returns” in the Section 18 (2).
But for the “nays that had it” when votes were taken on the amendment to Section 4(2), the National Assembly would have taken the powers to appoint officials of the CCB from the President.
The proposed amendment read: “The Principal Act is hereby amended in Section 4(2) by substituting the word ‘President’ with the words ‘National Assembly.’”
On the tenure of CCB chairman and members, the Senate deleted the old Section 1(4), which stated that, “The chairman and any member shall vacate office upon attaining the age of 70 and replaced it with, “The chairman and members shall serve for a term of five years subject to renewal for one further term only.”
The Senate however rejected the amendment to Section 1 (2)(b) by the House of Representatives, which attempted to reduce the entry age of the chairman and members of the CCT from 50 years to 30 years. The senators voted that the status quo be maintained.
The debate on the amendment recorded more controversy when the senators got to Section 4(2) and Section 18(2), which divided the lawmakers on the floor of the chamber.
Those who called for caution included Adamu Abdullahi, APC, Nasarawa-West; Enyinnaya Abaribe, PDP, Abia-South; and Yahaya Abdullahi, APC, Kebbi-North.
Ahmed Lawan, APC, Yobe-North, however, warned against the amendment process, noting that the legislature should make laws for the country and not in favour of individual lawmakers.
in his argument, Ike Ekweremadu, deputy Senate president, however, said that there was no ulterior motive behind the quick passage of the bill.
Shehu Sani, APC, Kaduna-Central, however, said since the Senate had decided to discuss the bill, lawmakers should be allowed to do so.
Barnabas Gemade seconded the motion but the nays had it, which signalled the continuation of the amendment.
— Nov 7, 2016 @ 01:00 GMT
|
Related Posts
FG shuts Eko bridge, ramps for 8-week repairs
THE Federal Government on Friday shut down the Eko Bridge and Ramps for eight weeks for essential asphalt resurfacing. The...
Read MoreCSO urges early registration of 2025 Hajj pilgrims, calls for review of Hajj bureaucracy
INDEPENDENT Hajj Reporters, a civil society organization that monitors and reports hajj activities has appealed to NAHCON to instruct state...
Read MoreNigerian child’s future brighter with education loans- Tinubu
PRESIDENT Bola Tinubu says the future of the Nigerian child will be brighter as the path to take them out...
Read MoreMost Read
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Keep abreast of news and other developments from our website.