Unlocking the presidential litigation jigsaw
Opinion
By Steve Nwabuko
Statistics, not law, is sure path to reclaiming Peter Obi’s stolen mandate.
BY use of input output analysis or inductive and deductive reasoning, will open up the fallacies behind INEC’s spurious databases on state by state basis using simple chy-square statistics to measure the confidence intervals and level of significance between total number of accredited voters on BVAS and total number of manually collated or counted votes by INEC staff at ward, LGA and state collation centers.
This is because the level of significance shows the disparity between what is real or actual, or input or inductive reasoning and what is ideal or fake or output or deductive reasoning.
*By tampering with election results or figures through mutilations, cancellations, muddling up, or rewriting of figures, takes the battle to sensitive numerical analysis rather than legal diagnosis.*
Therefore, Labour Party must look beyond the law to statistical computations and synopsis to unbundle INEC’s clairvoyance in real terms.
*What INEC did was to turn figures up-side-down, and what Peter Obi’s lawyers must do is to turn the figures up-side-up using analytical methodologies to undress fraudulent machinations of INEC.*
This is going to be the greatest election litigations in the annals of Nigeria’s history if Labour Party may broaden their team of representation to include not only Lawyers but Statisticians, Research mathematicians, Computer Coding Analysts, Scenario Planners and software application writers.
*In the same manner Labour Party recruited huge numbers in its Presidential Campaign Council, it must recruit not less than one hundred Professionals as per above mentioned disciplines to handle the 36 states and Abuja election results diagnosis, inferences, dialectics and interpretations for legal briefs.*
*By running the Presidential election on two platforms: analogue (manual collation) and digital(BVAS capturing), INEC thought it could pull a wool over our eyes, but rather have opened itself to scientific ridicule and prejudices.*
This tribunal case is Labour Party’s to loose if they fail to recruit broad based competent team to defend it and to unbundle the inherent process flaws that attended to INEC’s gross incompetence in process integrity.
The OBIdient movement can fund this momentous legal battle to it’s logical end.
I write from a very strong knowledge of Research Methodology in building coherent thesis for defense.
A.
Related Posts
Leadership insights: 40 minutes with Governor Oyebanji (1)
By Abiodun Komolafe I recently had the honour of visiting Ekiti State, where I embarked on a self-guided tour to...
Read MoreSir Paul Chukwuma, a son of grace
By Obi Trice Emeka SIR Paul Chukwuma could have been a priest. He had spent the early part of his...
Read MoreMr. Magic: Dotun Oladipo @ 55
By: Ajagbe Adeyemi Teslim THE true quality of a leader reflects on the standard they set for themselves and their...
Read MoreMost Read
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Keep abreast of news and other developments from our website.